RaptorChrist said:
To me it seems like Reggie is saying that if Rockstar had began development of RDR2 with the knowledge of the Switch, they would have made the game differently. In other words, the RDR2 that we know and love may be 100 GB and too demanding for the Switch, but that's not the direction Rockstar may have went if timing was different. Reggie is probably the coolest man in the industry, and worked hard for his position. Your suggestion doesn't seem like a smart thing for the President of Nintendo to say. |
So it's cool to lie? As he really thinks it's the truth that if RDR2 was planned knowing Switch existence (well they had about 3 years to adapt the game if they wanted) then RDR2 would have been made with Switch version available?
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
