By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
RolStoppable said:
colafitte said:

Lol, it was you who talked about cost/profits, not me! I was just following your logic....

And why it's me the one who have to prove that second sentence?? I am the one saying there is no third party publishers spending on Switch. That's my point. You are the one who need to prove me wrong. There are no failing games from 3rd party publishers because they're not even trying (and i'm not counting ports).

Must be the language barrier. You initially said that "Switch is not allowing third parties to flourish," so that implied that third parties have tried, but failed. If your point was all along that third parties aren't spending big on Switch, then your original statement should have been "Third parties aren't allowing themselves to flourish on Switch."

Well, i said that because i felt it was implicit. "Switch as a hardware is not allowing third parties to flourish..." because whatever the reason. In my opinion, and is just that, my opinion, it's because the hardware limitations compared to PS4/XBO put a lot of pressure on 3rd parties to make different games that have to look similar to PS4/XBO relatives, so that's an added effort; Online service not being on par with the other two is a problem too; Nintendo first party games are so good, that other games can't receive the same attention, etc...