By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
colafitte on 02 December 2018
Edit Thread
mjk45 said:
colafitte said:
Now that we had Rol in our side......oops

I want to add, that i appreciate Rol discussions in this site a lot and it always is a pleasure to discuss sales with him, but i don't agree with him or any other who agree with him in relation to ban quickrick, and he definitively was not talking in my name. I did not follow this member as long as others but the time i saw him post he did nothing wrong, at least not to the point of being banned. If he is wrong all the time like people said, he has the right to be wrong. I'm against banning people for anything else that is not derailing topics everytime or because he/she insults or persecute other posters.

We need more posters, more opinions, more point of views....no less. And if you don't like what other says you have the choice of ignore him if you want, but bully another member is not the solution, even if you think sincerely is the solution.

I wish the ban for Rol is short so he can come back and still give good interpretation of sales as always.

This was the pot calling the kettle black when Rol bought up Moderation record and no change in attitude , while like you I like Rol and hope for a short ban , another part of me sees him being a protected species. time and time again he slanders people and do we see ever increasing ban lengths ,if not there should be consideration to extra time added to repeat offences, now having said that it should only apply from the date of inception.

Now I can see why the mod team can be conflicted I damn well am since I like Rol a lot and consider him a friend on this site, I wish Rol no harm that's why I didn't bring up a permaban, talking of permabans rather than ending up with a permaban for a repeat offence that may have been minor but crossed some arbitrary line, your ever increasing ban length punishes you for the reoffending portion of the particular offence and if the repeat offence isn't minor or just connected to number of offences  you still have the permaban.

Yeah, i understand what you say. Obviously both parts could do better, because is obvious quickrick generates some "reaction" from other members of this site because at the time of post this, rol's post have 20 "agree votes".....but still..., moderators are the ones who have to warn a member from banning or not by following the rules of the site, so let's them decide these kind of things.

Everything else is adding fuel to the fire.....