TruckOSaurus said:
I'm saying that at some point there's diminishing returns to having more. I agree with you on the fact there seems to be more content in the old mainline Pokémon than in Let's Go but I don't agree with the conclusion it's a cash grab or a rip-off because should the mechanics of Let's Go appeal more to someone than the old formula, the amount of Pokémon available isn't that big a factor. |
That's fine you don't have to agree, but hopefully you at least understand. My initial post that started all this was only explaining the reasons behind the cash grab claim.
JWeinCom said:
Can you explain how this question was in any way dumbfounding? Can you explain how giving you an opportunity to clarify your opinion is in any way disingenuous? |
Really shouldn't have to explain the obvious but I'll do ya one last. Your question has such a painfully obvious answer and has no relevance as I was not saying the number of Pokemon was the only factor. Now I'm not going to argue about the argument with you yet again, so enjoy the last word.