You still don't seem to be aware that you lost your argument the moment you couldn't support your claim by providing even one shred of evidence. But your latest post has so much wrong with it that I have to respond.
1. First, you've committed numerous fallacies (throughout the thread). Perhaps the most major is the high degree to which you've been moving the goalposts. You're redefining religion to whatever you like to make up evidence to support your claim.
This thread is about Republican Jesus: you responded by claiming the Democratic Party has been pushing more religious nonsense than the Republicans. I provided multiple examples where the Republicans were pushing religious nonsense as policy; you provided nothing except some girls marching in a feminist parade. You then later claimed that was somehow an example of religion, that some speech made by Elizabeth Warren is an example of religion. In practice, you pulled a definition out of your ass. The validity of a definition doesn't care how passionately you believe in your own pig shit.
I'll rephrase my last closing line since you seem completely oblivious as to what I am accusing you of:
Either you have an incredible misunderstanding of one of the most commonly understood concepts in all human history, religion. Or that you are aware you've been caught lying about seeing more religious nonsense from the Democratic Party, and you'd rather instead come off as exceptionally ignorant or profoundly delusional.
2. The red herring you keep pushing is laughable. You're going off on some weird rage tangent against feminism. What does that have to do with providing examples of all this religious nonsense from the Democrats? Even after I pointed this out in the previous post, you blatantly continued rage-bashing feminism. Again, whether or not you hate feminism or not is irrelevant.
3. Although this delves back into the red herring, just to show how ridiculous your post is, I'll also point out your utter lack of consistency: To my point: Feminism is the advocacy for political, social, economic, and legal rights for women.
You responded: "ok can you list for me the rights women do not possess at this point in time?"
And say a couple of lines later: "men and women are clearly not equal and can never be equal no matter what they do"
I describe myself as a little dose of toxic masculinity.
