JWeinCom said:
Ummmm... no. You repeatedly claimed I was being illogical and biased. And you claimed that it being for a difference audience and it being more accessible was just a "narrative" made up as an excuse. And you repeatedly insisted I explain myself lest I be a hypocrite. So, that is totally not what was happening. But when I explain with actual evidence why the game is indeed more accessible, and why another audience would prefer it this way, suddenly the tone is changing. |
Um yes, you are quite free to think that lol. You needed only explain yourself once just so I could understand where you're coming from. The tone on my end never changed, your initial post was always the main subject matter. You suddenly dropped the issue after your 4th reply then went off on a one sided tangent because you didn't like the way I summarized your view. You also somehow read "Pokemon is already uber accessible" as "Let's Go isn't any more accessible." Naturally I don't feel like saying much to these points. They don't help make your initial comment more sensible nor do they invalidate the biggest flaw the game has which you didn't acknowledge after I brought it up. If you're still gonna write off criticisms by hardcore fans as baseless whining, like they can't also have facts backing them up, that people who like the game don't share any of the same criticisms, then you are indeed illogical and biased.
Now I think we've made our points pretty clear and it's certainly clear we wont convince each other of much else so this shall be my final response on the matter.
