| Wyrdness said: My last post is actually not putting your character into question it's a for future reference thing, I was explaining to you why your post came over as it did, you may think it's minor but believe me if you want to debate as you say you do missing out a few words can change context and look like misquoting which will further lead to your posts not coming over as you intend, it's not really about what other people will think but the person you're conversing with as deliberate misquoting is often a common tactic when people have arguments. People can only read the text in your post to go by not your intentions. |
I'm sorry, but "The fact you tried quoting only part of one line to skewer context says more about you than anything." is a pretty clear indication of a judgement of character, that's literally what it is, you're not going to change that just by saying it's a "for future reference thing". In my opinion, you should have thought that one out a little bit more, first thinking about whether it was just to shorten a quote, and second thinking about if it was just an accident, because your solution was uncalled for. There's no other way you can really read that, especially with the "skewer context" part, which implies that I was purposefully trying to change your quote to fit my argument. If it was just you mentioning "hey, be careful not to misquote" that would be one thing, that's not all you said.
I really can't believe two such trivial words that no one would have cared about lead to this. It seems to me you've been pretty hostile since the beginning honestly ... like since as early as the 2nd reply. Not much to really say here, we'll just leave it at that. Good day.
