| AngryLittleAlchemist said: Hm .. I skimmed over this post and thought it was a "sorry for misinterpreting your intention" but then I see that you are kind of insulting me? "The fact you tried quoting only part of one line to skewer context says more about you than anything." Like ... what? Here is how I quoted you: "Too bad most of the contradictions from the Zelda fanbase aren't explained" Here is how you quoted yourself: "Too bad most of the contradictions from the Zelda fanbase aren't explained by it " You're saying my integrity as a poster is in question because ... I didn't quote the "by it" part? What does that even change in the sentence? It means the same thing! And even if it didn't shouldn't your first thought be that, I don't know, I wasn't anal enough to care about two words? Rather than saying "Ohhh this says a lot about you". I was simply shortening a quote, it doesn't change the meaning or context at all. Like what ... Also, the "Zelda cycle" is well known, hell if you looked at one of my posts just a few comments earlier you'll see I even kind of mentioned it (when I said that I can't wait till the next Zelda comes out so people can complain about the legit problems with BOTW). !!! |
It's not an insult if I wanted to insult you believe me I'll just be direct, the full quote shows I'm responding to what you said explained the contradictions what you quoted even leaving out one word changes the context of the quote to anyone who may read your quote even look at the two quotes in your post one is referring to something with the "it" part the other looks like it's just making a statement for someone looking to debate you should realize this as it can look like you're deliberately quoting something out of context.
