JWeinCom said:
Lonely_Dolphin said:
That doesn't change the fact that the same statement can be said for every game ever, all you have to do is replace the word Pokemon in your sentence with any other game. To actually be specific, you'd need to name people's reasons and explain why they're invalid. For example: "Splatoon having gyro aiming is not a flaw when it's completely optional." Here you can't replace Splatoon with any other game as the sentence would no longer make sense, that's how you know you're being specific.
With that said, what are these reasons you've seen? You said most reasons, so you do believe the game has legit faults afterall then despite your initial post, that's good! No game is without flaw afterall.
|
No... it really can't be said about every game. Because fans of other franchises may be making valid criticisms. The criticisms I've seen from hardcore fans (simplified battle system, no random encounters, and so on.) Do not seem to be.
I don't know why you'd think my initial post implies the game has no faults. I said I thought a score of 81 was fair. If I thought the game had no faults, I would be arguing that an 81 is unfair and it should get 100. Wouldn't I?
|
Yes it can as every game has criticisms and fans. Whether you think the criticisms are valid or not is only your opinion, just like whoever making the statement would have the opinion that they're not valid, so the statement is always able to be made even if it is an unreasonable one.
So you believe the reasons the game got points docked are completely different from fan criticisms. I've not looked at reviews admittedly but I have to doubt that. Now you've provided a mere two reasons that you say are invalid without any explanation. I'm not gonna agree with you of course, but I would like to see where you're coming from, try to understand the other side and all that.
