The_Liquid_Laser said:
Wyrdness said:
That doesn't really absolve your earlier point because NES was still significantly more powerful than other consoles.
|
The NES was considered weak when it was released by the people who knew hardware. First, the processor was really old (same as Atari 2600). Secondly, the standard during the video game crash was the Commodore 64, which was 8-bit. It was the weakest and therefore cheapest and most popular computer. It's successor was the Amiga, 16-bit, released in 1985, the same year as the NES.
The Amiga was supposed to trash the NES. The conventional wisdom at the time was that consoles were a fad, and they were replaced by PC's. Obviously that didn't happen. The weak NES trounced all over the 16-bit Amiga instead.
I remember those days. Every single kid on my block and the next 2 blocks had an NES. Every kid but one. This one kid showed me his Amiga. He had Marble Madness running on it with very pretty graphics. But I felt sorry for the kid. The NES had so many better games, and his parents bought him an expensive Amiga instead.
|
The NES released in 1983 not 1985 the latter is the western release date.
