NightlyPoe said:
This seems to be a case of it only being unconstitutional or even controversial because Trump did it. There are a ton of examples of presidents making appointments like Whitaker's going back to the beginning of the republic. Well over a hundred by some estimates I've seen. I'm open to the suggestion that presidents can abuse this power, (Clinton did and Congress passed a law setting limits) or even that it's been unconstitutional for the past 230 years and we're only just now realizing now that it's been bad. But it's hard to escape the notion that the sudden panic over the Constitution being trampled by temporary appointments is simply because of the man making the appointment in a manner that virtually all his predecessors also followed at one point or another. |
This should be interesting. Since there is a lawsuit on Whitaker appointment, I guess we will see if this is constitutional or not. When you really think about it, this is what happens when you piss everyone off. Its not like we didn't see this happen during the Obama years so nothing really special. If people believe there is even a hint that something goes against the constitutional then we will get countless lawsuits.