By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
ResilientFighter on 13 November 2018
Edit Thread
flashfire926 said:
ResilientFighter said:

Alolan forms of gen 1 are garbage and lack creativity. Sun and moon is a disappointment it lacks gym battles and those z moves are weird. So if your benchmark of pokemon apex is the last gen that was released then this game is far better than the 67 you claim it deserves 

Fighting wild pidgey and geodude is not in any way what makes pokemon great. Raising your pokemon and catching collecting are the main points plus exploration which is in its prime now wuth these amazing graphics that allow kanto to shine better than 20 years ago and 15 when the remake was released. 

Sun/Moon were great pokemon games. The totem battles felt more like boss fights than the gym leader ever was (which was just normal polemon just two or three levels wbove normal). Alolan forms were qm awesome idea, especially exeggutor and ninetales.

No, wild battles are a huge part of pokemon, which make catching feel more rewarding than this waggle based minigame will ever do.

Better graphics wont make kanto any less of a bland region. Sun/Moon had more side areas to discover than red/blue, so there is no way exploration is in its “prime”

Gyms > alola 

Isn't this how your logic works?? If it lacks something it sucks? Well lacking gyms fights is waaay worse than lacking the ability to pound dumb weak wild pokemon like rattata zubat oddish 1000 times per playthrough 

Alolan designs are underwhelming and have very few interesting pokemon. that game was not better than this one. i played both already and while both are more child oriented than anything before X & Y at least this game has one of the greatest gens backing it and the power of the switch. 

Alola is not a better map than kanto its lore is not better neither are its characters.