curl-6 said:
All that ultimately matters is the end result. Whether the circumstances make the situation understandable is just another matter of opinion. You may not care what I think, and that's fine, you don't have to, |
"Discussing the circumstances would simply lead to a drawn out debate I'm not interested in."
Ok ... then why even reply to a comment that wasn't directed to you and that was extremely detailed where the overarching point wasn't even responded to in your reply?
"but I am going to continue to call out bad practices and piss poor support when I see it."
I mean ... I've called out some of Capcom's bad practices on Switch. Put simply, they're as big as deal as you make them though. Especially when you consider the micro-transaction infestation that plagues consoles with big third party support, worrying about whether a game needs to be partially upset is so minor.
You didn't call out piss poor support, you just listed a bunch of personal qualifiers (most of which I even can accept and agree with to an extent), and then didn't respond when I showed that there was at least 3 games that fit your qualifiers. You've yet to show me a huge list of publishers that are better than Capcom, and since you aren't interested in the original point about Japanese publishers as a whole ... I'm left wondering what was even the point. Again, for like the 3rd time, you haven't listed publishers who are significantly better, and given that you can't refute that Capcom is one of the only AAA publishers who's putting out a decent amount of high quality content, your point is meaningless.
You're acting like the Switch is the PS4. It isn't. There isn't a huge list of eager big-name publishers jumping up and down to get in line. And in that sense, Bethesda, Ubisoft, Capcom, and a few others are among the better supporters of the system.