By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
mjk45 said:
LudicrousSpeed said:
Man what a lame list of games. Like, some great franchises on there, but the games they included from those franchises, why? Like Destruction Derby for example. Why the original, when Destruction Derby 2 was way better? Or doesn’t this thing come with two controllers? Why not DD Raw, the best one, which also has split screen MP? Same for games like Twisted Metal and Cool Boarders.

Where’s Wipeout? Rally Cross? Spyro? Tomb Raider? Crash? Why is Rainbow Six, which on PSone was by FAR the worst port iirc even included here? It ran at like 16 FPS and was shit to control. Why not one of the many many many iconic RPGs from PSone? Vagrant Story?

Japan’s list looks way better imo.

If it was to be a once off then I would agree with going with  certain sequels, but if you are looking to continue with say a classics 2 , Destruction Derby starts to make sense ,and with  just twenty games FF7 and wild arms covered the jrpg need while leaving room for diversity.

A $100 PlayStation Classic stocked with filler titles around a few big names, so that they can release another $100 PlayStation Classics 2, inevitably also stocked with filler titles propped up by a few big names?  That sounds awful.  I think any attempt at releasing another Classic from the same software library would receive serious backlash/bomb once it was realized the best titles from both should have been on the original release in the first place.  It would be like if there were multiple NES Classics, and they parceled out Super Mario Bros and Zelda on the 1st one, Super Mario Bros 3 and Zelda II on the 2nd one, etc...