mZuzek said:
Technically $20 a year, but if you buy a family subscription ($35) and share it among 7 other friends/family/whatever, it is around $4 for each person. And there is no restriction or limitation as to who can be in your family plan, not currently at least. (edit: well and of course you're also paying that money to play online, so it's not like you have much of a choice...) So, yeah. Why would any of you that only want to play a select few games rather pay $5 for each one instead of $4 yearly... I don't know. Even I don't care much about most games, but I'd rather pay the $4 yearly for a service that offers me loads of games, including those I'd otherwise pay specifically for. And yeah, as I said before, the current service doesn't offer me the games I want at all, but I feel it has potential to be much better than what the VC ever was, and even then the VC was also very sluggish when it came to adding new games, at least on 3DS and Wii U. |
Yeah I kind of agree with this as like Netflix it'll start off slow but if they add their library onto the service it would be better than VC.
