irstupid said:
I challenge you to explain why this ruling was wrong. I'll use your link and copy/paste directly from it. A federal district court found that the state's plan was marred by racially discriminatory intent, watering down the voting power of the state's Latinos. The lower court ruled that the state failed to prove that its map did not discriminate. But Justice Samuel Alito, joined by the Supreme Court's other conservatives, said the lower court was wrong to hold that the state had the burden to prove it was not discriminating. "The burden of proof lies with the challenger, not the state," he wrote. The challengers, Alito continued, had the legal burden "to overcome the presumption of legislative good faith and show that the 2013 legislature acted with invidious intent" when it adjusted the boundaries in response to earlier court rulings. Just answer that to me. What is wrong with that ruling? Oh and I suppose based on your last comment, you believe that voter ID laws are discriminatory. If so, please explain how so. |
That was 2013, and the problem still exist. the supreme court has the final say, and they didn't do enough to stop the voter suppression.
Never said voter ID is discriminatory. Strict laws does not equal discrimination.