By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
SecondWar said:
thismeintiel said:

Only to the Left, minus more sensible Dems like Manchin, is that on his record.  You have no proof he lied, yet continue to perpetuate that falsehood.

 

Actually several of his college fri nds have said he lied under oath in relation to what he said about his drinking habits in college. Of course, I think a lot of peopel do that in college, as did I at uni - and they tend to stop after they graduate, again as I did. The drinking isn't the thing they're pulling him up on, but that's he's lied about it - see below.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-10-02/classmate-says-kavanaugh-lied-under-oath-about-drinking/10326394

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/oct/05/brett-kavanaugh-lies-supreme-court-disqualify-any-office

Also, you've then hypocritically claimed Ford is lying. Lacking proof that someone is telling the truth does not mean they are lying, and you've given no proof to say she is making it up.

Again, arguing semantics and delving even more into he said, she said. There is no proof. And, more importantly, there are many that back his story, as well. You can't cherry pick. 

As for Ford, there are two instances we could 100% prove that she lied. About this incident traumatizing her so badly, she was afraid to fly because it was a confined space. She scrubbed her social media profiles before coming out. If the Committee requested those scrubbed accounts, we would most likely see posts about her being excited to fly to X. Someone that traumatized would not make flying a normal part of their life. We also know from building records that she lied about when and why she put a 2nd door on her house. It wasn't to have another escape route, but to rent out that part of the house. 

It may also be to prove she lied about prepping someone for a polygraph test. Of course, that would probably be more he said, she said, unless they could prove she owned or rented one at that time or photographic evidence, so most likely not worth pursuing.