By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
PwerlvlAmy said:
AngryLittleAlchemist said:

I must admit I am a little disappointed in the fact that your entire thing to fall back on is just you not talking about it because you are at peace. I think compared to most I am a lot more fair to Kav. I think Kav made the right call by being emotional, as being formal seems fake in the face of allegations. I thought there was not a lot of substantial evidence and that the investigation would find little. I wasn't even suspicious for a second (just too many allegations these days) until he opened his own damn mouth. 

 

Not wanting to have a real discussion with conflicting opinions (which is another problem Kav may have) because you are "at peace" is concerning. But you are free to do it. 

 

By the way, it's not really even up for debate if Kav lied. It is not something I "believe". 

You obviously want to fight, but sorry, that's not my M.O. 

I've said my piece on the matter :)

It's honestly odd that the reply where I actually give Kavanaugh an inch and explain that I don't agree with many of the criticisms against him (which already shows an ability to have a nuanced conversation about a very controversial political topic) is the one where you decided to just reply with a character judgement, that I just "obviously want to fight". Seems in poor taste honestly (also a little ironic because that perfectly describes thismeintiel's post against me) . Again it is perfectly fine to say you just don't want to discuss it, I have already said that. But the answer is not that I'm just looking to fight, because you seem reasonable from what I've seen and I expected to gain a level of understanding from your perspective, the answer is that you just don't want a discussion. That's fine, just underwhelming. 

Last edited by AngryLittleAlchemist - on 08 October 2018