By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
the-pi-guy said:
NightlyPoe said:

Again, you've moved away from saying he lied.  You're now quibbling over whether Kavanaugh's assessment of the meaning was too strong.

No I haven't.  

He claimed that it was refuted.  It wasn't.  

NightlyPoe said:

What's ludicrous about noting that the July 1 event doesn't match the testimony of the accuser and that its existence is not evidence that Kavanaugh lied about not being at a party that she described?

He did not say he was not at the party described.  

He said he was never at any party like the one described.  

It's like this.  Imagine someone was accused of stealing from a store, and their defence was "I've never been at any store like the one described." And he submitted his calendar, which showed him clearly going to the same type of store.  

You know you have no argument when you are reduced to arguing semantics.  It's time to move on.  He never perjured himself and no one is going to seriously pursue that angle legally.  Unless they want to lose all credibility.  It was just another lie to get the Dem base riled up. 

If anyone perjured themselves, it was Ford.  With her obvious lie about being afraid to fly and why/when the second door was put on her house.  The lie detector part may have been, but since it probably could never be proven, no point in focusing on it.