By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
contestgamer on 06 October 2018
Edit Thread
the-pi-guy said:
NightlyPoe said:

Even if I were to concede that point, you just conceded it as something other than a lie.

It's mischaracterizing evidence.  Does not make for a judge. 

NightlyPoe said:

Being in a different location, in a different type of building, with more people is very much a different type of event.

Well, I think that's ludicrous, but neither of us are going to change our minds on it.  

NightlyPoe said:

Devil's Triangle

Boof (an LA Times writer BTW)

Thanks, I'll concede on these.

contestgamer said:

Trumps is president, so he gets to choose his team. Why should he bother picking someone that shows good faith to half the country when that same half shows no good faith towards him?

He doesn't have to, but Obama did. 

Obama picked a moderate, that was suggested by Republicans.  

He had to for any chance of Republicans passing him. Trump right now can pass anyone he wants. The US population also wasnt as anti Obama as it is anti Trump, so Trump has more reason to do some pay back against Democrats.