shikamaru317 said:
In this day and age I trust user reviews more than critic reviews for movies. The Last Jedi is a prime example of why, critics adored it, but it was a terrible movie, I couldn't give it more than a 5/10 even if I ignored my preconceived expectations going in. I could list dozens of other examples where my own personal score deviated substantially from the critic average, and for those particular movies I find that my own score lies much closer to the user average than the critic average. |
1) The Last Jedi got high grades because, despite it being a bad Star Wars movie, it is still a good movie (according to most critics). The critics are supposed to review a movie as a movie, not as a sequel.
2) Okay, you wouldn't give The Last Jedi more than a 5/10. Great. Most critics disagree. It's okay to disagree with the critics. I myself wouldn't give Frozen more than a 3/10, and you don't see me going around saying that critics can't tell a good movie from a bad movie because it has a Metascore of 74 and a 90% on RT. Because that's MY OPINION on the film, and it doesn't need to be in accordance with the critics. That doesn't mean the critics are bad at critiquing movies. That just means that they liked a movie I didn't.
3) Scores are surprisingly subjective. The level of quality I want a film to have before I give it an 8/10 is surely different from the level of quality you want a film to have before you give it an 8/10. Two people can enjoy a film exactly the same and give it radically different scores.
4) Critic scores for games usually align with your scores because a game involves much more technical aspects than a movie does. And technical aspects are much more objective than creative aspects. A game's score involves gameplay, bugs, etc., while a movie's score will mostly care about its story. That's why movie scores generally vary so much more than game scores too (Venom's scores vary between 12 and 75. Super Mario Party's scores vary between 60 and 90.)