DrDoomz said:
Nothing is stopping them from invenstigating once he’s confirmed. If he IS guilty of sexual harassment, then he could just be prosecuted once he’s in office. Til then, we assume he is innocent until proof comes out that he’s not. Anything else would just be a stalling tactic. Edit. Also, it doesn’t address what I said because what I said is that the democrats could just as easily try and sully any judge’s reputation if the precedence of accusation = guilt is followed (w/c is what the democrats are trying to pull) and the fact that the democrat politicians have IMO shown to everyone that they are willing to do anything and everything to prevent Trump’s nominee from being in the SC. |
True, a judge can be impeached.
I see now, you see it as a sham. Assuming that is what the democrats agenda is, to "sully someone's reputation.." The FBI can still just do their job without limitation and find absolutely nothing. no harm done, reputation intact = you get the job. However I don't think the democrats are saying he is guilty, they're saying they want everyone to be heard and interviewed. Ex. like his classmates, college roommates, etc.