Miyamotoo said:
I don't comparing anything, you wrote "why should people opt for a mini version when they can't get the best experience on the original Switch? The potential of a such a model would be limited by default", I simple gave you example of another best experience. How GC can be in that comparison when we had only one version of GC!? Again you dont make any sense, I will not even read rest of your post or even try to answer. |
"I don't comparing anything"
Yes, you are: "Buy your point Pro and X would need to be best selling option of PS4/XB1 because they offer best experience for PS4/XB1".And this is what i addressed (best experiences).
You are comparing two different realities to try and make a fair conclusion. But it's a flawed conclusion as you ignored what would be/is different between Pro/X and a Switch +.
Thus, opting for the best option in Switch +'s case would not be/isn't the same as opting for the best option in the case of Pro/X.
"Low price option has much higher potential for sales"
In theory.
GC's 99$ didn't cause a sales burst, did it?
You claimed that low price options have higher potential for sales.
I responded that that is not necessarily the case. And it's not because it's a revised version (specially one that results in an inferior product/experience) that really changes that.