By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
SpokenTruth said:
Signalstar said:

Not ONE word in my post makes reference to the attempted sexual assault allegation. I do not think it can be definitively proven to have happened or not happened. I err on the side of believing he is innocent in tthe absence of concrete evidence.

 

HOWEVER in defending himself from the allegation he displayed an unbelievable and unacceptable amount of partisan bias and hatred for the opposing side for someone who wants a lifetime appointment to the Supreme Court  It's not a matter of me liking him or not (I don't) but I cannot trust him to be ffair in his rulings based on his incoherent and rambling screed. I am not alone iin my concern.

I second this exact concern.

Pretty much this. As far as the Senate is concerned is behaviour at the hearing should be enough to get him booted.
That and all the lies. Also disrespecting the panel repeatedly.