By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
deskpro2k3 said:
DrDoomz said:

That doesn’t address what I said, but if you say so. /shrug

It does address what you said. You want someone clean? Then let the FBI investigate the claims to see if they're fabricated lies or not.

Nothing is stopping them from invenstigating once he’s confirmed. If he IS guilty of sexual harassment, then he could just be prosecuted once he’s in office.

Til then, we assume he is innocent until proof comes out that he’s not. Anything else would just be a stalling tactic.

Edit. Also, it doesn’t address what I said because what I said is that the democrats could just as easily try and sully any judge’s reputation if the precedence of accusation = guilt is followed (w/c is what the democrats are trying to pull) and the fact that the democrat politicians have IMO shown to everyone that they are willing to do anything and everything to prevent Trump’s nominee from being in the SC.