OhNoYouDont said:
Have you paid any attention to this whatsoever? She wasn't raped. In her mind, he attempted to rape her but what he accomplished was limited to groping and attempting to remove her clothes e.g. sexual assault. Innocent until proven guilty is a legal concept. This is not a trial. There is no judge (besides Kavanaugh himself), there is no jury. This is you and me in a neighborhood with Kavanaugh as our neighbor and Dr. Ford as our neighbor and we're trying to decide if we want Kavanaugh to continue living with us. There aren't any holes that are materially relevant to the assault. Does she know who did it? 100% Can she describe the events? Yes. Does she recall who was in the room at the time? Yes. Focusing on what she does not remember rather than what she does is really quite odd. The things she remembers are clear as day, the other items are irrelevant to her. Still waiting for you to present evidence in your democratic scheme conspiracy. I noticed you did not offer anything at all. |
Sorry, I forgot the "about" part (fixed it), but innocent until proven guilty isn't just a legal concept, but common sense. If I claim someone is a murderer without proof why should anyone believe me? She should've still went to the authorities right away so they can get proof or evidence of some kind. She didn't and just so happened to say something 35 years later when it is convenient for Democrats.
Here is a video showing some holes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qj7TgtlY17c
What Ford remembers:
-The stairwell
-The laughter
-Brett Kavanaugh
What she doesn't remember:
-When it happened
-Where it happened
How she got there
-How she got home
-Who was there
-Conversations she had even as recently as 3 months ago
This isn't even getting to the flying part lol.
Last edited by Snoopy - on 04 October 2018
