Why is that thinking so strange to you? What do you think is the most likely scenario (in 2017), people spending 300$ on a PS4, more on PSN and game(s) + 300$ Switch + game(s), OR those people who already bought 80+ million consoles, buying a Switch in higher numbers than newer PS4/XB1 users? I know that Japan is another story. But i don't really think it really changes things. |
'Unlimited financial resources'?
Neither system is *that* expensive, but thank you for explaining why you made that flawed assumption. You're assuming that not only are people unable/unwilling to buy two systems, but that everyone is an early adopter. Many people wait for a console to gain a significant game library and drop in price. That's why consoles tend to peak in sales 2+ years after release. Switch will be at that point when PS5/Xbox 2 release at full price making it a great buy for those waiting for the new consoles. PS/Xbox owners who are early adopters have likely already picked up the Switch because if they are early adopters, they will have bought it early in its life cycle.
The country with the second largest video game market doesn't change things? That seems like a deliberate choice to ignore things that don't fit your opinion. If the Switch does as well as the 3DS (and it's outpacing it in a launch comparison) that 23 million in Japan alone.







