By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Trumpstyle said:

Guys just give it up, it's very likely Ford completely made up this story as I said previously. She has made several changes to her story now, from how the assault happened in her late-teens and in the mid 80:s to age 15 and to early 80:s. She changed the location of the house during the hearing, changed how the house looked inside.

She can't remember how she got home, but says she had no driver license and the way home took 20 minutes to drive. How did she get home? Just walking would take about a day considering the driving distance and there was no cellphones back than. It would be difficult to get home and she can't remember it?

She claimed in the letter to Feinstien there where 5 people at the party but in the hearing she changed it to 6 people and could had been more.

Most importantly her therapist notes don't corroborate her story any longer which she used to get washingtonpost to print this story. Now they would had never printed it.

 

Notice what all three allegations has in common, there are not a single first-hand witness that can corroborate it. Despite there being a total 7 witness named and should potentially be upwards 100 first-hand witnesses. Only witness that has so far corroborated it is a anonymous dude that said he heard about the second incident and a lot of people knew of it. Well every reporter right now has contacted every classmate in highschool, college and probably a lot more people. So far found nothing except that he was a heavy drinker.

Forgot to mention in my previous reply to you, but she also changed her story in a big way concerning PJ Smyth.  At first, he was one of the boys in the room with her while this supposed attempted rape happened.  She called him a bystander.  Then, when we get to the actual hearing, "Oh, that was a mistake I made. He was actually downstairs."  Why the change?  My guess is it has something to do with some piece of info that PJ had in his letter he signed under threat of perjury.  So, he went from an accomplice, or at least someone who watched it happened and did nothing, to no guilt at all.  Very fishy.  Along with everything else.

coolbeans said:
Jaicee said:

Yesterday, I made it through another day without being confirmed to the U.S. Supreme Court and my life (such as it is) wasn't ruined or anything! Just passing along the update.

Good to know.  Say, how have you been holding up in these respects:

-having millions upon millions of people in your native country believing you to be a rapist/attempted rapist based on uncorroborated allegations?

-those same people validating those beliefs based on your angry response to such charges that'll live on with you for the rest of your life--EVEN IF all evidence pans out your way?

-the harassment your immediate family has experienced based on this?

If all of your answers to those following questions are "I haven't experienced these things so I wouldn't know," I suggest reevaluating what you actually put across with this comment. 

Don't forget.  Even if he is voted in, the left and their Hollywood machine will portray him as a rapist til the day he dies and after.  While Ford will be given a cushy job and be praised to no end.

Final-Fan said:
thismeintiel said:

Dems opposed him.  Called him evil.  Said he would kill millions with his rulings. 

You've made this "kill millions" claim several times.  Can you identify what you are basing this claim on? 

Here you go.  Have fun wading through these cesspool quotes.