By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Torillian said:
thismeintiel said:

Oh, that's strange.  The way you stated that, it seemed like you knew exactly who these people were and how they acted and talked back then.  I figured you were their friend.

Maybe you should try and wait for her to disagree with him before you act like you knew exactly what happened between him and his friends.  I'm pretty sure she is one of the women who is standing with him, though.  Which probably means what he said was truthful.

"According to reports, Dolphin had initially been one of 65 women to endorse Kavanaugh after the sexual assault allegations came to light from Christine Blasey Ford. Dolphin withdrew her endorsement after Ford's accusation came to light."

https://abc7chicago.com/politics/brett-kavanaugh-explains-devils-triangle-other-yearbook-references-/4354071/

“I learned about these yearbook pages only a few days ago,” Ms. Dolphin said in a statement to The New York Times. “I don’t know what ‘Renate Alumnus’ actually means. I can’t begin to comprehend what goes through the minds of 17-year-old boys who write such things, but the insinuation is horrible, hurtful and simply untrue. I pray their daughters are never treated this way. I will have no further comment.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/24/business/brett-kavanaugh-yearbook-renate.html

So now that you know she took her name from the endorsement and that she thinks the insinuation is horrible and hurtful can we agree on the obvious?

You may want to go ahead and read the whole thing. Cause she even says that they never even kissed, which he believed they did. So, she says no sexual contact at all, which he said, as well. So, why would they write that if it didn't mean what he said? They each took her on a date at least once, where nothing sexual happened. Sorry, still doesn't help convict the man.