DélioPT said:
He is not wrong. He brought a very good perspective to sales: You are also forgetting something that changed last gen: consoles lowering their price tags to a minimum are becoming a thing of the past and because of that gamers already now that it's not really worth waiting for a lower price point. The 3DS price cut wasn't just because it was 250$, the console had very little meaningful support coming soon or announced to make it worthwhile paying that price. PS4, since launch, has only lost 25% of it's orignal price (400 to 300) and that didn't stop them from selling 80+ million units. "offcourse that in Japan $170 3DS will sell better than $300 Switch simple because $300 is high price to start like Nintendo handhelds usually selling in Japan" As i said, 3DS might have the price advantage, but Switch has it's own advantages. |
He is wrong, sales of smartphones didnt effect or lower price point of consoles, actualy it made worse for handhelds, why would someone pay $250-300 for gaming handheld when they can buy smartphone/tablet that offers so much more outside only gaming even for less money or even for free through subscription. Phones/tablets made things worse for handhelds and Switch, not better. There is valid point of inflation, but when we comparing $170 from 2012. and $300 in 2018. we again talking about huge difference in any case, with adjusted inflation make difference maybe is around $20 for 3DS price point.
That really depending from price point of device itself, 3DS had price point of $250 and now you have 2DS for $80, some Switch revision will defiantly at one point have price point of around $150. People that buying secondary consoles will waiting for lower price point, not to mention families that plans to have multiply Switch units per family (device per person instead device per family).
Simple, 3DS had huge price cut because didnt sell well enough, it's simple like that, they wouldn't make huge price cut if they were satisfied with sales. So point is about sales, if Switch had bad or if Nintendo wasn't satisfied with Switch sales you can bet that Switch would have also price cut. You need that huge majority of people buying console for what consoles is offering currently not because what console will offer in year or two.
I am not assuming anything, fact is that handhelds are much popular in Japan than they are home consoles in any case. Even Wii that sold 102m in Japan sold less than 13m in Japan while 3DS sold almost 25m in Japan alone from 73m combined world wide. So yeah its very safe that in Japan huge majority see Switch on first place like handheld only. How Nintendo is marketing Switch is totally different thing, we talking about very specific market that very difrent compared to others markets.
Might!? Fact is that 3DS had huge price point advantage for same time period, just for record, Switch with price point of $300 was selling better than 3DS was selling with price of $250, 3DS start selling better in same time period only after huge price cut. Switch has own advantages, but still dont have appealing and popularity like Nintendo handheld usual have in Japan because still have high price point for handheld. Are you serious!? Even $200 Switch would destroy 3DS sales in same time period, fact is that handhelds were always much more device per person not per family, and $300 is still high price point for that appealing. Also, maybe you dont realise, but 3DS had incredible strong sales first few years in Japan, 3DS become 3rd best selling handheld/console ever in Japan, only DS and GB/GBA sold better than 3DS.
Last edited by Miyamotoo - on 30 September 2018






