pokoko said: I don't care what you're interested in hearing about, to be perfectly honest. I'm simply saying that you're a hypocrite who changes your argument and then acts like you didn't. *burp* If you're saying now that what you said at first was wrong then I'm fine with that. Just don't try to act like I was wrong to point it out and don't do all that rationalization over what you said and then try to paint "lol" as some kind of ridiculous exaggeration. *burp* Adding "lol" didn't make what you said look ignorant, what you said did that all by itself. You were wrong. That argument is over, as far as I'm concerned. |
By the way before you go, do you understand the definition of the word fallacious? I am not doing this to "1up!" you or offend you, I'm genuinely asking. This is something I fuck up a lot of the times myself. People use the word fallacious wrong and as such it can get confusing.
In it's literal definition fallacious means : "based on a mistaken belief" and a fallacious argument means is an argument based on a false notion or interpretation.
So if you admit that I clarified what I said, doesn't that mean that technically the word choice of fallacious was right all along? You're agreeing that I clarified something I didn't mean for you to interpret. Therefore, your arguments against that interpretation were fallacious.
I didn't change my argument and I'm not a hypocrite. All of your past few responses have been pretty bad because they call out random things to try and make a connection that isn't there. But sure Pokoko, be passive aggressive. That's very helpful in a discussion.