| Dulfite said: Seriously this is incomprehensible to me. Nintendo has always had bad free internet on past devices. The fact that it runs much smoother now alone makes the $20 worth it a year, which is far less than Sony and Microsoft fans are paying. On top of that we get a growing list of free nes games that have online capabilities now? Wow! I'd pay far more than $20 a year for this. I just don't get this anger? Do you want Nintendo to go back to their horrible connections on the Wii with Brawl? Do you people not remember how horrible of an experience that was? No to free and terrible Internet! I'll gladly pay this every year!
In fact, find me a petition to increase the amount! |
Ok ... Nintendo has not announced any dedicated servers that come with the subscription service. As far as we know, the difference between the quality between Switch multiplayer before the subscription update and after will be nothing. You're paying for peer to peer, not Nintendo's own servers.
The Wii U's multiplayer was not even that bad. Splatoon and Mario Kart 8 played very well. Smash was a fuckup but fighting games are known for having complications with Net code.
It seems to me like you are just purposefully being ignorant to try and have a blissful result. We could receive more information and that information might make the service sound a lot better. But a lot of what you are saying has no correlation with what facts we have currently.
The nerve to go as far as asking for the amount to increase? I'd expect a writer to be more educated at the very least, but to be so anti-consumer is crazy.
