By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Tulipanzo on 02 September 2018
Edit Thread
Mr Puggsly said:
Tulipanzo said:
After 17 pages it's still laughable that y'all have taken unconfirmed pre-order numbers to mean "gamers hate women".

Before anyone cites EA's response as some sort of mortal offense to the gaming community;
1) It was explicitly referring to people that would have a problem with women
2) It just called them uneducated, which is barely an insult and more of a statement: there were women in WWII (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_in_World_War_II)

So for this many people to be offended by EA, it'll still mean they think they were talking to them; ergo that they have a problem with women.

17 pages?! You need to increase the number of comments per page. Its only 2 pages for me.

Women were involved in WWII, but the game is also rewriting history. Personally, I don't really care. Do I think they put women in games to appease certain groups? Absolutely. I just don't care.

I don't think the average gamer or person in general supports the SJW nonsense. But are people really not buying games because of SJW values at studios? Its hard to wrap my around that.

It's pretty telling that, despite admitting that women were in WWII, you still would consider their inclusion is SJWs pandering.
Tells me more about anti-SJWs that they'd see any inclusion of women, even when historically accurate, as pandering to undisclosed "groups".
The reality is that for some people having women in their war game ruins their power fantasy, and it's masked as concern for historical realism to mask how pathetic it is.