| flashfire926 said: Again, I don't get what point you're trying to get across. I never said that Battlefield is totally realistic, nor do I really care if they want to go for realism or not. This is not what the debate is even about. It's about real life WW2, and them claiming it's a totally realistic scenario that they portrayed, when they could've just ONLY say "its just a game" and be done with it. The first part of that sentence was obviously straight-up sjw pandering, and cannot be put any other way. |
I just provided a very thorough, detailed, and honestly not hard at all to follow reply. Even used quotes so you could understand what I was responding to. If you don't want to understand you don't have to. However you kind of just proved my point. You aren't into this discussion because you care about how it affects the game. You're into it because you care about idealism and identity politics. My "point" is that both sides are disingenuous. Originally this all started because you kept changing your language to make it seem like there was absolutely nobody that was creating backlash out of their own sexism. You clarified that it was just a mistake on your end, to which I said fine we have no disagreements. But then you responded to something else I said, which we again elaborated on. Your argument was based on false premises, I tried to reply to it, and now all the sudden "you don't get my point". It really is starting to just seem like convenient excuses are being made any time a point of yours is being criticized. Then again, people seem to think "points" have to be one-sided and overwhelmingly obvious, so I guess a reply that both blames DICE and it's followers is going to be misunderstood. If that is the end of the discussion, good day. However I hope you at least walk away with some form of self reflection or nuance.
