Avro1958 on 25 August 2018
I don't see how EA is really re-writing history with the inclusion of female characters. Women did have combat roles albeit not common, Russia was the only allied power I believe that used women in combat roles then there was the resistance. I see this character as more of an homage to that then anything. Why do some men get all uppity over this? BF is hardly realistic to begin with. I am a guy, I have played BF since BF 1942, I took a bit of a break with BF 3 and 4 but got back into it with BF1 and I will get this next one. Why EA/Dice is taking flack over this is just stupid, they are doing plenty of other crap that people should focus on (DLC and Nickle and diming the consumer).
