By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
taus90 on 25 August 2018
Edit Thread
AngryLittleAlchemist said:
taus90 said:

So you are defending EA comment about "being uneducated and sexist" as a mere misinterpretation, and yet you went on to break down his comment and misinterpret it to make a point, hmmm irony or contradiction. 

Hmmm lets contradict some more. So anybody with a knowledge of history will easily point toward women in WW2 with Prosthetic arm went home there weren't many on the front line to begin with, besides Russian snipers and medic duty, Secondly there is difference between having an authentic WW2 experience and expecting a realistic potrayle of WW2, for example everybody knows car handling in GT is not 1:1 of their real life counter part, but if it starts to handle like NFS thats a problem.  Third point many people who are labeling this as something against women are conveniently omitting the fact people also complained about a dude weilding Katana, but we have to ignore it coz its a dude, and doesn't suit the agenda of calling people sexist.


"Sad thing is, the comments given by the developers and EA are just as dumb as what the fanbase have stated. Really, there is no defending a company as shitty as EA or a developer as lolbad as DICE."

Literally the next line my guy! 

And what flashfire is criticizing IS a misrepresentation because the developer was not talking about prosthetic limbs and cricket bats. However, the comment the developer made was dumb (just from the simple fact that it is technically wrong in regard to what they've shown), as I said "You could make a case that the comment is pretty stupid because it isn't very substantive". 

Nothing in your comment is substantive because it either doesn't apply or is literally addressed in my comment. I am fully aware there are completely different sides that just happen to fall under the anti-EA flag. In fact, I say it in the comment! Wow! 

that's my point! you pointed out his contradicting statements as base of your argument, yet you went on and gave three scenario for EA's statement and how it could have been perceived and then went on to contradict yourself by saying "Sad thing is, the comments given by the developers and EA are just as dumb as what the fanbase have stated. Really, there is no defending a company as shitty as EA or a developer as lolbad as DICE."

So what makes Flashfire argument and contradiction invalid and yours valid?