Azzanation said:
I come to VGChartz for gaming news and curious for gaming figures, however lets be honest here, these so called figures that some come here for turn what is suppose to be a meaningless stat and turn it into a major flaw with a product and do nothing but downplay products that are not number one on the sales charts. I look at the industry as a whole, I never cared the PS3 was the least selling system for most of last gen, I never cared the WiiU was the least selling console this gen and I surely don't care the X1 is the least selling console now. I know how businesses are run and some need to move past basic barbaric sales numbers and need to start looking at the bigger picture. Its all about the money and this gen money is sourced from many types or avenues not just physical hardware sales like in the past. As for these services, this is where MS see the money, not how many consoles they sell. In fact its these type of services like GamePass and Play Anywhere that diminish there very own physical game sales and it seems that doesn't bother MS at all, so its clear that MS (A company that knows how to make money) are heading in this direction. Weather its successful next gen will wait and see, as for this gen it seems to be working for them. |
Yes you don't care about sales, but are always talking about it. You care about revenue but can't show sources. Very comfortable position where you can deny all you don't want to see.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."