Mnementh said:
DonFerrari said:

Sure thing, just not sure it was what he aimed at.

Still I guess usually they would give a 14 or 16 years old equivalent classification for mature content that doesn't cover sex, nudity, cursing, gore or drug abuse.

No, the rating only considers if a content may be harmful for a children. For the rating it does not matter if the content can't be understood by the child or doesn't appeal to it.

Well I remember seeing several movies with 14-16 without sex or violence. But sure I may be wrong.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994