By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
zorg1000 said:
DonFerrari said:

Sure, let's just pretend I didn't got a logical argument discussion just a short while ago here.

Where did I say it isn't timely manner? 30 people earning about 85k a year would make us have about 2M USD to port the game. That is a cost that shows it isn't easy or super cheap to port and that is all that matter. Let's say PS4 took aditional 3 months and 10 people to port or  3.2M to get ported. Do you think Diablo 3 with sell on Switch 66% of what sold on PS4?

PS4 is "easy" to port, Switch is also called "easy" to port, same for X1. Still none of them are pennies to do.

You just admitted to using hyperbole so you are mocking people for saying that Switch is an easy system to work with & that some games skipping Switch is a missed opportunity.

Why does it need to sell 66% of the PS4 version?

Way to jump the gun. Why would hyperbole of "turning a buton to make the port" would be mockery?

The people claiming Switch as an easy to port system I'm talking about are the ones thinking it is something totally mundane, easy, very low cost...

If the port costs 2/3 to make why not expect 2/3 the sales to recover it?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."