DonFerrari said:
1) That is just your googles that see only what you want to see. 2) 10 people working on it from blizzard side. More people under contract (which wouldn't make sense if it is less than blizzard folks) so the 30 people working 9 months is a good amount of people, doesn't make it easy. A good game can be made with 100 people over 3 years so this port taking 1/3 of time and 1/3 the size of team (or additional 10% cost) just to port doesn't make it something mundane that can be just effortless. I blamed the platform? Nope. Just see my conversation with KLXVER. If you didn't rush to defend Switch and do personal attacks you perhaps would see it. My point is just that Switch isn't really as easy to port as someone just pressing a button with almost no resources needed, so ports that don't go to Switch either are because they would be severely cut down or the ROI wasn't attractive, simple as that. No hate for Switch or Nintendo. I probably have more Nintendo games than you have playstation. |
Oh, I completely agree on that, and it should be apparent to anyone with an ounce of programming skills. However, that's a far cry from your initial post.
And you have no basis on your rationale on the cost and effort of this port. You're simply guessing at this point (as we all are, due to the lack of info, of course).
Also, wanna bet how many vgchartz-ers would agree with me on you having an agenda against Nintendo?
My themeforest portfolio:







