By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Errorist76 said:
potato_hamster said:

Well it depends on what you mean by "there yet" for you, that means "well enough that it's tolerable for VR enthusiasts", but for me it means "ready for mass-market adoption". It's not close to that.

The fact that you try to equate current VR solutions with the fucking iPhone says everything you need to say about your mindset when it comes to VR.

I mentioned that exactly because of you talking about mainstream success of pioneering new technology... I' sure you can see the connection.

There is no connection. VR has existed for literally decades. This is not "pioneering new technology" in any way. It's just a better version of it.

The fact that you just put the first model's total sales up there without the context for why it only sold that many units shows how you're not looking at VR reasonably. Imagine in its first year if the PSVR was only sold in Best Buys in America, only worked with PS4 Pros, and required a persistent internet connection. That's about on par with the first iPhone's retail situation. And it still sold *six times* what the PSVR did in one year before it was replaced with the iPhone 3G,

That's why the first iPhone only sold 7 million units. What's PSVR's excuse?

Last edited by potato_hamster - on 16 August 2018