|
Azuren said: This conversation doesn't, however.
Again, you're injecting a narrative into my words that wasn't implied. I'm not your strawman.
Did you really use the most criminally under-utilized studio in gaming to justify MS purchasing game studios?
It doesn't, someone expressed distress at the idea of MS purchasing a studio and you asked why someone would be distressed by it. So no, it isn't off topic, it just distresses you. |
And many answered in here about that theory. This is not just exclusive to MS, its a standard business practise. I even gave you a studio that still sits under the MS banner with its doors still opened. And its one of the oldest as well. You never answered that instead you just gave a standard none answered response. If you are going to bring up MS closing studios theory than explain Rare? If not than shall we get back on topic because I am not interested in turning this thread in a direction it doesn't need to go.
