By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Mnementh said:

I'm kinda torn about this. Not about the question as it is, but about the generation thing at all. On the one hand, I see the usefulness to group things in the same category. On the other hand it is only working because most of the time the manufacturers decided to release their platforms not to far removed from each other.

But there are already examples that stretch the definitions of gens. Look, the Dreamcast and Xbox weren't sold at the same time (Dreamcast was killed 2001, end of 2001 released the Xbox). Still they both are counted towards the PS2-gen. In reality though Dreamcast and Xbox never competed against each other.

Precisely, this destroy this argument of wich systems is competing with. Not only that, but how Xbox360  and PS3 have been competing most of their time with a 6 gen console (ps2),sharing many multiplat games. Bu but power! So in what gen can we put the wii?

To make it simple to their argumentss, guess onlyy Sony and MS can begin a new gen bc Nintendo is not worthy everytime they release a new platform that replaces their old one.

hh



 

 

We reap what we sow