By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
pxrocks said:
KLAMarine said:

I'd much rather prioritize sales on a quality basis rather than fuss about whether the game is first or second or third party.

Even When a third party games with much higher quality releases on nintendo platform nintendo gamers still gonna buy the same Pokemon mario zelda.

How does one objectively measure quality?

pxrocks said:

when games like doom skyrim and other games start to sell more than Mario Zelda

They do sometimes. Doom and Skyrim have the luxury of selling across more than one platform. Tetris, Minecraft, and Overwatch sold HUGE in part because they exist on > 1 platform.

pxrocks said:

then iIcan say that nintendo gamers are out of their sick mindset.

Buying games that appeal to them doesn't make them sick.

pxrocks said:

they always devalue third party games and overvalued nintendoNi fp games.when I ask a nintendo gamer that " are you going to buy this awesome new ip day one" then he always says"no I am gonna buy it when it drops to 20$"he rather gonna buy a rehash port like mario kart 8 for 60$(Overpriced as all nintendo games).this type of thinking is cancerous to the game industry.third party devs also work hard on their games same or even more than Nintendo's dev.so never undervalue  third party games.this is a message to all the nintendo fan/gamer/fanboys.

New IP being outsold by established IP is par for the course all across the industry, not just in Nintendo's corner.