Does anyone still think smash ultimate is a port?

[Nautilus]

Amnesia said:

JWeinCom said:

Well, first off, that's kind of a bizarre point of view.  An opinion is valid or not valid based on reasons and supporting evidence.  Whether the majority of people believe it does not make something true or untrue.

Secondly, you're not really arguing opinion, you're arguing about a definition.  If I wanted to refer to call dogs wolves, I may be able to justify that (after all they are 99.9% identical, far more than Majora's mask and Ocarina), but since that's not the way we use the words, nobody is going to understand me.  You can't use your own definitions if you want to communicate with others.

It is not my own definition, I am just describing the fucking obvious truth !

Majora is not a port, but I don't call this a new game. I don't even understand how it is possible to debate this. If you believe, that Majora is to be considered as a NEW game like Breath of the wild is, then we can stop to discus simply and just ignore each other.
MK64 was a complete new game at 100%, MK8D is a port at 99%.

Truth?Good lord, are we now going to redefine what facts are?

Look, you can have your own opinion on this, as long as you admit you are wrong.Opinions are something, definitions are another.