| flashfire926 said: The way people talk like here it would seem like another forced vivendi-ubisoft takeover.... But it's not. Obsidian is not being forced to oblige. It's their choice. And their choice should be respected, whether they say yes or no. But no, they HAVE TO ASK US FANS FIRST! HOW DARE THEY!? If Sony acquired obsidian, people would be cheering and celebrating (completely ignoring the fact they themselves has closed half a dozen studios in the last decade as well), only because it's exclusive to their console of choice now. |
Yeah its crazy how the community works on here. They would much rather Sony buy them out where than they become solely exclusive to PS devices and nothing more, locking away cross play and the only way to play it is on PS console, yet MS a company who offers variety in terms of features and venues is considered a bad industry move. Heck if Sony brought Obsidian I would expect QTE based RPGs. Yet lets hate on MS.
Gamers need to make up there minds here, they cry about MS not having any games yet cry when they do something about it. Its actually so sad it makes me laugh.
|
bananaking21 said: "But according to Kotaku UK's sources, the project -- initially pitched as a "medium-scale game, a AA game"" thats more evidence that MS didnt want big budgets on these games
link https://www.gamasutra.com/view/news/274665/Why_Lionhead_sank_beneath_the_weight_of_Fable_Legends.php |
Where does it state that MS didn't give Rare creative freedom?
EDITED: Okay I thought you were talking about Sea of Thieves. We all know Fable sucked after 2, MS tried to turn Lion Head around by changing them unfortunately it was too late and there last 3 games were a disaster which led to the doors closing. That's obvious.
