SuaveSocialist said:
1. You are asking me why NYCrisis corrected melbye's error. I ask why you raise this question to me instead of NYCrisis. I ask you where NYCrisis said anything about what's acceptable. 2. Only when you provide rational answers to my questions will you have the privilige of discussing logic/illogic with me. |
1.Because you defended him without seemingly knowing motives.
2.You did not ask questions in the first place, you made a statement about what others said and i did question that.







