PAOerfulone said:
But it's more profit, nonetheless. |
There is cost of opportunity.
It would all depends if making the port would bring more ROI and future profits than not doing it. Sometimes it doesn't.
But sure, several of their decisions not to port seems like in the end made they less profit (not that it would be certain the opposite would play out if they made another decision)
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."