By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
HoloDust said:
DonFerrari said:

To me, personally, it's ridiculous to put a lot of money and effort to have a poor look intentionally, but I do know a lot do it =] I rather invest on pristine and pretty

Honestly, I'm not sure why South Park costs as much as it does (meaning per episode). I can only speculate that due to animation team being in US, being fairly large (70) and having to do the job in a week (and often making changes day before airing an episode) they are well compensated. Do the same thing in India or South Korea, where I believe most of 2D stuff is done, and it will be fairly cheaper.

Perhaps they do to much hand draw animation instead of using more computer aided solutions.

Hynad said:
DonFerrari said:

To me, personally, it's ridiculous to put a lot of money and effort to have a poor look intentionally, but I do know a lot do it =] I rather invest on pristine and pretty

Octopath Traveler has a good look intentionally.

We were talking about South Park show in that convo.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."