Wyrdness said:
Not cutting edge doesn't equate to poor like you've tried to argue. When you try to argue a stance you take on the angle you're coming from in this case you tried arguing the content was not as good as what it is in other games so you got a rebuttal that dealt with that angle it's only when you were debunked that you began back peddling saying you meant this and that. Even the non sense you're coming up with now about saying it's not to some people's tastes has bugger all to do with what I said because I was addressing someone who was equating budget to value. I'm pulling you on whether it's your first language because your responses do not match the debate you're arguing in any context the only way for that to happen is either a language barrier or if you're deliberately arguing something to just try and push your stance, as for being personal believe me if I went personal after you tried to slick you wouldn't be here right now your hands would be shaking while you look off into the sky somewhere. Why should I say the same to the OP I wasn't responding to him and he hasn't responded to me I responded to a post about budget how about you say it to the op and don't tell others what to do. |
sure not cut edge doesn't equate poor but also doesn't scream 60 usd.
you assume to much and the claim back pedalling. quote me saying the cont is good or bad and then you can try and claim back pedaling. still something costing more to make generally justifies a higher price.
the argument is the OP so if you want to deviate from that and say you only want to discuss the premise someone else made fine, but that have nothing to do with language barrier. But please make me shake in fear of your excellent arguments. Seems like ypu quickly forgot your confusion between tool and material.
The thread is to discuss what was put by OP so if you don't want to discuss what he put the you are derailing and being of topic... besides being condescending. I have already replied OP.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







